medievil
6 days ago
"Kids’ TV has a porn problem, LOL"
So this is running about. Apparently people are just now figuring out what Rule 34 means and Loud House got a nice little section in one of the articles.

https://medium.com/@brazyintheday/kids-tv-has-a-porn-problem-84592d9514fc

https://www.cbr.com/cartoon-fandom-has-a-puritanism-problem/

"Children’s cartoons like The Loud House — Nickelodeon’s hit show by Chris Savino — already have thriving groups of adult artists creating fetish art ranging from inflation to lolicon of the 6-year-old Lana Loud, all of which is accessible with an innocent Google search of her name. On YouTube, viral videos like “Lynn X Lincoln" and “The Loud House Characters as Anime,” each weighing in at 2.2 million views, reimagine the show’s cast of children in disturbing ways. The former shows a post-coital scene between 11- and 13-year-old siblings as the sister wonders whether she could become pregnant.
Del
6 days ago
Ah yes, this train wreck. Personally I still think kids should be supervised when browsing the internet. But apparently so many people disagree with that. Makes you question some things.
Misha
6 days ago
Del said:
Ah yes, this train wreck. Personally I still think kids should be supervised when browsing the internet. But apparently so many people disagree with that. Makes you question some things.


It's less that people legitimately care about the kids and more that they're a convenient excuse to get rid of [insert thing I don't like here.]
Del
6 days ago
Misha said:
It's less that people legitimately care about the kids and more that they're a convenient excuse to get rid of [insert thing I don't like here.]


That much is glaringly obvious, but then you have total dumbasses who actually argue why its bad for parents to monitor their children LOL
Rising_sun
6 days ago
What the fuck did I just read? no, seriously, wtf? are this guy for real? are they virgins to the internet or something? because this is a new level of mindblowing. And that retarded way of thought of pointing fingers. It makes me remember the idiots who censor or outright ban violent games for "mu chchildren" th ESRB was created for a reason and if the game has a glaring +18 on it then it means it's not for kids. this is ultimatedly the parents' fault, if you can't be 24/7 then install a filter or whatever but banning or deleting other's content just because you are a failure as a parent?

no, that will never be more than a coward and irresponsable way of thought
Eternal_Pain
5 days ago
I blame Shadman personally.
Misha
4 days ago
These people's minds would be blown if they found out about Tijuana bibles.
Lerianis
2 days ago
Del said:
Misha said:
It's less that people legitimately care about the kids and more that they're a convenient excuse to get rid of [insert thing I don't like here.]


That much is glaringly obvious, but then you have total dumbasses who actually argue why its bad for parents to monitor their children LOL


So... why are those people dumbasses? Truth of the real world: The 'innocence' of children is going to go away sometime (if they ever really had it) so why try to protect them from naughty pictures.
Eternal_Pain
2 days ago
Lerianis said:
Del said:
Misha said:
It's less that people legitimately care about the kids and more that they're a convenient excuse to get rid of [insert thing I don't like here.]


That much is glaringly obvious, but then you have total dumbasses who actually argue why its bad for parents to monitor their children LOL


So... why are those people dumbasses? Truth of the real world: The 'innocence' of children is going to go away sometime (if they ever really had it) so why try to protect them from naughty pictures.


So are you just outing yourself as being underaged?
Del
2 days ago
Lerianis said:
So... why are those people dumbasses? Truth of the real world: The 'innocence' of children is going to go away sometime (if they ever really had it) so why try to protect them from naughty pictures.


You're absolutely right. Pictures are just pictures. Its not gonna hurt anyone. NOW lets move onto the potential pedophiles who'll take advantage of a child's naivety because of parental negligence, manipulate them to make bad decisions, like revealing sensitive information and next thing you know, you're putting up "Missing Child" posts around your neighborhood wondering where the hell your child went. Still wanna say people aren't dumbasses for claiming you shouldn't always monitor your children when they browse the internet?
@Lerianis
Growth does not need to include harrassment or assault. In fact, such things actually hurt a child’s ability to mature. And since we don’t actually know all the details and techniques real pedos use to hurt real child, it’s understandable that western society doesn’t like taking risks like that.
1


Reply | New Topic | Help | Forum Index